HRMC criticised for causing confusion
05/09/2014
HMRC have been heavily criticised for causing confusion by sending out “incorrect” letters to higher rate taxpayers who they suspect have not repaid their child benefits.
If a parent in a two child family earns over £50,000, they are required to payback £1,770 in child benefit payments. Additionally, if a parent earns over £60,000, then all child benefits for that tax year need to be repaid.
This rule applies to all households where one of the parents are paying the higher tax-rate, and in the case of both parents earning over £50,000, the highest earning parent would be assessed.
The taxman sent out over 30,000 letters to high earning parents, claiming that they have failed to include their child benefits on last years self-assessment tax return form.
However, it has since been suggested by accountancy firm UHY Hacker Young that the HMRC took a “scattergun approach” and sent incorrect letters out, as they failed to check if an individual’s partner had already made the necessary payment.
Unfairly targeted
Mike Crellin, tax director at UHY Hacker Young said a “significant number” of his clients had been unfairly targeted, as they had been told they owe money, despite having fully paid their taxes.
He said: "We have had lots of queries about these letters from concerned taxpayers, who thought they had their affairs in order but are now worried that they have made an expensive mistake". However, Mr Crellin continued to insist that in the majority of cases he’s come across, his clients had actually correctly completed their tax return.
Despite fierce criticism, a spokesman for HMRC defended their mailing. He said that the letters were designed to “help taxpayers get their returns right by reminding customers who file under self assessment of the importance of including the high income child benefit charge on their tax return."
Need financial advice?
If you have any personal finance questions related to this news article, then please contact our financial advisers. You can get in touch by asking a question online, calling us on 0800 092 1245, or by arranging a visit.
Share this..
Related stories
£136 million a year on missed calls to HMRC, at taxpayers’ expense.
Last year £136 million of taxpayer’s money was spent on delayed or unanswered calls to the HM Revenue and Customs. The National Audit Office (NAO) reported that delays cost customers £33m in call charges while they waited for HMRC to answer the phone and the estimated value of customer time while they waited was £103m. It was said that 20 million calls to the HMRC hotlines were not picked...
Read MoreHM Revenue and Customs forced to announce further concession
HM Revenue and Customs has this week been forced to announce that those who "owe" the UK government taxation from the past will not incur interest on any outstanding figures. Despite the fact that the outstanding figures are purely and simply because of mal-administration within HM Revenue and Customs, astoundingly, there have been indications that HM Revenue and Customs would still look to charge...
Read MoreWill child benefit be means tested in the future?
Iain Duncan Smith has certainly put the cat amongst the pigeons at the Conservative party conference this week with a suggestion that child benefit will be means tested after 2017. He believes that the new proposed universal benefit payment will absorb the likes of child benefit and ultimately households in the UK will be means tested on their overall household income as opposed to individual inco...
Read MoreIs JP Morgan the first casualty of the banking bonus tax?
The UK government is today reeling from news that JP Morgan, the US financial giant, is reconsidering a £1.5 billion London head office in light of the government's banking bonus tax. While the company has remained silent in public, it is believed that Jamie Dimon, chief executive of JP Morgan, called the chancellor Alistair Darling and threatened to scrap the introduction of the company's new Eu...
Read MoreWho will take over the role of the Audit Commission?
The coalition government's decision to drop the Audit Commission in favour of a forecast £50 million a year saving has caused many eyebrows to be raised. The very nature of the Audit Commission is to oversee how taxpayers money is spent by the government, something which David Cameron and George Osborne appeared to be very keen to continue. However, the decision to disband the Audit Commission an...
Read More