FSA confirms additional applications to be added to shorters banned list
In a move which could seriously back fire on those companies involved it has been reported that a number of companies have applied to the FSA to see if their company shares can be added to the shorters banned list. This begs the question - 'What do these companies have to hide?'
Traders are very astute when looking into the financial background of many companies and while there are some rogue traders, highlighting any financial weaknesses or problems within a company is fair play by law. So why would a company apply for protection from the shorters? Why would they want to be seen to be running to the regulator at the first opportunity?
While names have not been confirmed there is speculation that a number of insurance companies were involved in the call to the FSA. This is a sector which has come under increasing scrutiny in the US and is set to come under the microscope in the UK. There will be problems for some UK companies, the details of which may not yet be in the public domain, but this is a free market.
It was interesting to see that the FSA has not added any more companies to the list as yet, reflecting the possible understanding that it would be unfair to meddle too much in the workings of the investment markets. After all, saving a troubled company now could lead to more problems in the future - as the US may be about to experience!
Share this..
Related stories
Scottish Power accept selling ban
05/03/2015 Energy supplier Scottish Power has failed to meet regulator Ofgems customer service targets, leading to a 12 day sales ban. The firm will be unable to engage in “proactive sales” from the 4th March for 12 days, as they failed to meet Ofgems targets to clear up all outstanding Energy Ombudsman decisions regarding customer complaints. In November, energy regulator Ofgem advi...
Read MoreIs Lloyds bank set to hit the market for £15 billion fundraising?
Lloyds bank appears set to raise up to £15 billion from existing shareholders as the group moves to reduce the cost of the government's toxic debt insurance plan. The move appears to have the tentative backing of the UK government, which is a 43% shareholder, although recent results from the company were far from pleasing for existing shareholders.
When you consider that Lloyds ban...
Non-executive directors start to feel the heat
While in the olden days many people believed that the non-executive roles across many of the U.K.'s leading companies were "jobs for the boys", this situation has certainly changed over the last six months. The sudden demise of companies such as Royal Bank of Scotland and other banking arrangements in the UK has led to further scrutiny of the whole non-executive director system which should have s...
Read MoreCar insurance fees hit £333m
Britons are paying out huge sums in fees to car insurance providers every year to make amendments to their policies, it has been revealed. The fees are charged by providers when drivers fail to notify them of changes which could invalidate their policies. These include a change of address or name or improvements to vehicles. Price comparison site uSwitch.com calculates that some £333 million was...
Read MoreStep forward Richard Branson, Northern Rock is for sale!
The UK government will later this week confirm that Northern Rock will be split into a "good bank" and a "bad bank" after expected clearance from the European Commission is confirmed. It has also been revealed that the mortgage specialist assets of the group will be sold in the short term and should raise around £1.5 billion which will be injected back into the UK government coffers.
Read More