UK government renames pension initiative
The UK government made some amendments to the "Personal Accounts" pension system which has now been rebranded as the "National Employment Savings Trust" otherwise known as Nest. This is the government's initiative to try and head off the ever-growing and ever more critical pension crisis which is gripping the UK at the moment. This is a crisis that has been building for many years but which has now reached a pivotal point with many believing the UK government has left it too late to act.
Under the new reforms, workers aged between 22 and the traditional retirement age, and also earning in excess of £5000 a year, will have to be enrolled in a pension scheme by their employer, unless they have a better scheme available or opt out. Each employee will be obliged to pay 4% of their salary into their Nest account, employers 3% and the UK government 1%. This equates to 8% of the employees gross pay and will allow them to save for their retirement.
Even though the scheme will begin in 2011 it will not move to the automatic enrolment system until 2017 and there is bound to be some confusion and misinformation between these two dates. In principle the idea is excellent, as it will allow many people to save for their retirement, but in practice there are fears that not all employers will be able to fulfil their obligations.
Share this..
Related stories
UK defined benefit pension schemes in serious trouble
It has been revealed that the pension liabilities of the U.K.'s defined pension schemes have topped the £1 trillion mark as the sector goes from disaster to disaster. Despite the fact that UK stock markets rose during August the overall deficit between pension liabilities and pension assets increased by £16 billion to a staggering £195 billion. So what next?
When you consider tha...
Should the formal retirement age be abolished?
A report by the Equality and Human Rights Commission has today prompted a very controversial and deep thinking argument regarding the UK retirement system. The commission has called on the government to abolish the formal retirement age and indeed introduce incentives for employers to retain those more mature workers and use their experience for as long as possible. But is this something of a doub...
Read MoreReader's Digest book could be closed after 70 years
In yet another reflection of the ever-growing pension funding problem in the UK, the British arm of Reader's Digest is seething on the verge of collapse with a £125 million pension fund deficit seemingly to blame. The American parent company Reader's Digest Association recently filed for bankruptcy protection in America and has been in discussions with the British Pensions Regulator for some time...
Read MoreUK pensioners concerned about the future
A survey from Aviva Group has today confirmed that just under 70% of workers in the UK, around 33 million people, fully expect to work beyond their retirement age purely and simply as a way of making ends meet. This is yet another reflection of the growing difficulty facing many people in older age as the cost of living continues to rise in the UK and pensioners appear to be off the radar with reg...
Read MoreUK government accused of raising pension age too quickly
The National Association of Pension Funds has today stepped into the mix to suggest that the UK government is being "too hasty" with regards to proposals to increase the state pension age for men to 66 years of age from 2016. The Association believes the government should look to equalise the state pension age for men and women to 66 years of age from 2020 in order to give those in their mid-50s m...
Read More