Would a Robin Hood tax be passed on to consumers?
As the clamour for the introduction of the so-called "Robin Hood tax" continues to grow, there are concerns that introduction of a tax on every financial transaction in the world would effectively be passed on to consumers. The truth is that the vast majority of taxes and additional costs targeted at the financial sector, or any other sector for that matter, are almost inevitably passed on to consumers in the long run. So would consumers be paying yet another tax to save the world?
When you consider that taxpayers around the world are already paying billions upon billions of pounds to their national governments for services and economic assistance as a whole why should they be taxed again?
It is also worth remembering that the financial sector contributes billions upon billions of pounds to governments around the world in the shape of corporation tax and income tax for employees. This is a sector that every government in the world has looked to forge a strong relationship with because ultimately without financial liquidity and financial backing the worldwide economy would literally grind to a halt.
Surely now is the time to improve liquidity in the worldwide money markets, rather than taking more money out of the system via the proposed "Robin Hood tax"?
Share this..
Related stories
Beware scam websites
HM Revenue and Customs have recently issued a statement regarding scam websites targeted at people looking to reclaim money from the tax authorities. While these websites look and feel apart, they are nothing but a front for online fraudsters looking to harvest your personal details and then go ahead and apply for finance in your name and clear your bank accounts. So how can we protect ourselves?...
Read MoreEU set to clamp down on banking bonuses
EU officials are said to be in discussions regarding new regulations covering bonus payments in the European financial industry. In what may well turn out to be the hardest hitting changes to the financial sector in recent times it seems that upfront bonuses could be limited to 30% in cash, bonuses could be limited to a multiple of salary and at least 40% of future bonuses may well need to be defe...
Read MoreGeorge Osborne rejects EU bank insurance tax
Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne is today set to fight EU plans to introduce a bank insurance tax which would be charged against all banks operating in Europe and used to set up a fund to cover EU bank failures in the future. There is concern from within the UK government that the creation of a bank insurance tax administered by the European Union could encourage excessive risk-taking in...
Read MoreUK government set to issue "death tax"
As we covered in one of our earlier articles, the UK government is set to push through a so-called "death tax" which will see a one-off levy charged against all estates in the UK. While the proposed levy is being put forward as a way to spread the ever increasing cost of home care for the elderly it is being seen by many people as an attack on the rich. There is no doubt that a higher proportion o...
Read MoreBonfire of the quangos is burning bright
The UK government has today announced the abolition of a whole host of quangos which are effectively unelected bodies which depend upon taxpayer funding to carry out their activities. They range from everything from the Competition Commission to a quango in charge of farm labourer rates of pay. The government has confirmed the largest restructuring of these particular unelected bodies for decades...
Read More